Sunday, October 11, 2009

Statement of the Honduran Episcopal Conference on the dialogue

“Let us seek what contributes to peace and make us grow together.” (Romans 14: 19)

1. We, the bishops of the Honduras Bishops’ Conference, meeting in our Ordinary Assembly, feel very united to all the people who, both within and outside of Honduras, have paid attention to the dialogue which is being held in order to seek a constructive exit to the political crisis which our country is living.

2. We have experienced in our own flesh, in the Church and in society, the sufferings, divisions and violence which this prolonged crisis has brought with it. He have lived the worry and the fear that a solution might be sought by the paths of violence.

3. We declare our support of the dialogue which began anew on October 7. In every moment we have advocated for that pedagogy [educational process] of sincere dialogue which diligently seeks the best solution for everyone in charity and truth.

4. We ask those directly involved in the dialogue and those they represent that “everyone of them, overcoming personal inclinations, make efforts to seek the truth and resolutely pursue the common good.” (Words of Pope Benedict XVI about the situation in Honduras at the Angelus, Sunday, July 12, 2009)

5. We cannot continue with the uncertainty, personal and social tension, and the economic deterioration. What is urgent is a solution which is just, peaceful, and agreed upon which “assures peaceful life together and an authentic democratic life.” (Words of Pope Benedict XVI)

6. The presence of members of the Organization of American States, the European Community, and the national and international press is a sign of the interest there is that this dialogue carries the ship of our nation to a good port. The people of Honduras have put many hopes in this national dialogue which cannot remain frustrated since that would lead to a great deception and increasing personal and social tensions.

7. In this climate of dialogue which ought to be respectful and understanding, every form of violence – of word or deed – would be prejudicial and would be an attack on the attitudes which favor dialogue and would lead to a failure of credibility for those who provoked such violence.

8. We believe that the established dialogue is not to be narrowed to a technique of solving conflicts but it has an ethical dimension, since the exercise [of dialogue] implies moral attitudes and is at the service of what is good, just and true for our people. Consequently, those who sit at the “table of dialogue” have a serious responsibility before God and before society which they ought not forget or underestimate.

9. We are conscious that a political agreement is not the total solution to the serious problems which plague Honduras, but at least would place the country in the suitable institutional conditions to confront them, in the framework of a joint plan, with the participation of everyone, in accord with the principle of subsidiarity and with a new style of political working which “places the common good as the principle imperative for the construction of a new society.” (Pastoral Letter of the Honduras Bishops’ Conference, “By the Paths of Hope,” # 15, March, 2006)

10. We are praying persistently and with confidence that God would grant all of us, and especially those responsible for this dialogue, wisdom, capacity to listen, social sensitivity, and a spirit of discernment. We know that other persons are praying for this intention. We invite the Catholic faithful and all believers to intensify that prayer so that God will grant us times of peaceful living together, social justice, and development with solidarity.

Tegucigalpa, October 8, 2009
Signed by the archbishop and the bishops of the country

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have read this and read this and still don't understand what they're trying to say.

The scriptural quotation is a warning against judgment, and especially a warning against judgment over the dietary laws. But this is not what the dispute in Honduras is about. In a larger sense, it's about whether some people eat and others don't. In a narrower sense, it's about whether the people who conducted the coup can admit that they were wrong. It's their narcissism that is blocking resolution.

They could have waited Zelaya out, or tied him up with a trial for the last days of his Administration, but they chose a provocative, confrontational course that drew the entire world into the national soap opera. The "San Jose Accord," strips Zelaya of any real power and turns him into a ceremonial figure. If the coupistas accepted it, within a few months they would control the country again. The resistance does not have enough candidates to significantly affect the composition of Congress. It's doubtful they could win the presidency, but if they did, their candidates are not experienced politicians like Zelaya. They could be outmaneuvered. But the coupistas are not thinking rationally. The stake in this contest is not the control of the country, but whether certain egos are catered to. And so they keep destroying themselves and Honduras by becoming more and more stubborn and destructive.

What the Conference seems to be saying is "speak nicely to one another and think of the national good." Nice advice, but it reeks of how far the church has fallen from prophetic power. Not to be crude, but they need to take names and kick butt.

Spiritually speaking, of course. By naming the fears of each side and the lies (mostly on the right, but a few on the left) and the evils of society that they themselves walk by every day. I suspect that not until they themselves are clean will they be able to speak with power.

The regime gave the Conference an answer yesterday, in the form of two bursts of machine gun fire. I don't suppose the bishops came up with a proper theological response to that.

--Charles of Mercury Rising.

John (Juancito) Donaghy said...

I think the bishops are trying to let themselves be accepted as a force in the situation. The statement is light in any significant analysis or criticism of the situation.
As opposed to Bishop Santos'strong critique of the coup as the work of the wealthy elite and his statement that a constituent assembly should be a matter of discussion, this statement does not offer any new initiative but only leaves the way open to more of the same.
It is the first time the bishops have spoken since the July 3 statement that virtually supported the coup and so they may be trying to make sure they have a voice in the current "dialogue."
It is not enough, but at least the bishops have not repeated the error of their July 3 statement.

Anonymous said...

sigh.

Well, it certainly seems to me like finger-in-the-wind beliefs, Brother John. It's stuff like this that troubles me about the Church.

--Charles

John (Juancito) Donaghy said...

I agree. That's why I am glad that I am volunteering with Bishop Santos and the diocese of Santa Rosa de Copán! with the poor!

Bishop Santos says he is pastorally accompanying the Resistance. Other priests say that the diocese is with the Resistance.